que created by qr-code
Viewing sample resized to 78% of original (view original) Loading...
Parent: post #1799648 (learn more) show »
Description

commission for (MISSING)

OPERATION CHEESECAKE

She Shouldn't have followed this unknown person for learning code...
looks like she is now learning the Master/Slave input and output in real time >:3

Blacklisted

    The hardest part of this scenario for me to accept is the code on the wall. If it's worth distinguishing slave #1, it's worth implementing it as a proper array of slaves. You're also missing a semicolon on line 1. That's never gonna compile.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 14
  • kohne said:
    The hardest part of this scenario for me to accept is the code on the wall. If it's worth distinguishing slave #1, it's worth implementing it as a proper array of slaves. You're also missing a semicolon on line 1. That's never gonna compile.

    Probably because it's just pseudo code, because the artist doesn't know any proper programming language and he needed to put some code in to make it look funny and intelligent.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • randomguy85 said:
    Probably because it's just pseudo code, because the artist doesn't know any proper programming language and he needed to put some code in to make it look funny and intelligent.

    Are we just gonna ignore the fact that writing code on a wall isn’t a normal thing to do

  • Reply
  • |
  • 11
  • QR-Code Comment by an artist on this post

    Member

    randomguy85 said:
    Probably because it's just pseudo code, because the artist doesn't know any proper programming language and he needed to put some code in to make it look funny and intelligent.

    I speak QR-Code >;3

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • kohne said:
    The hardest part of this scenario for me to accept is the code on the wall. If it's worth distinguishing slave #1, it's worth implementing it as a proper array of slaves. You're also missing a semicolon on line 1. That's never gonna compile.

    since we're discussing code:
    - I agree with the point ing an array for slaves
    - the naming convention (and array creation) makes it seem like python. in which case it wouldn't need to compile in the first place
    - if that's actually the case, those semicolons would be a problem as python does not use those to close off instructions
    - What seems really problematic to me though, is that the assignment of Q seems to be the wrong way; slave_1 = Q (e.g. setting slave_1 to be equal to Q) would make more sense to me than Q = slave_1 (e.g. setting Q equal to slave_1)

    am I late to the party?
    Yes.

    Am I putting too much thought into this?
    Probably.

    Do I care?
    Nope, not at all.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • random~erby said:
    since we're discussing code:
    - I agree with the point ing an array for slaves
    - the naming convention (and array creation) makes it seem like python. in which case it wouldn't need to compile in the first place
    - if that's actually the case, those semicolons would be a problem as python does not use those to close off instructions
    - What seems really problematic to me though, is that the assignment of Q seems to be the wrong way; slave_1 = Q (e.g. setting slave_1 to be equal to Q) would make more sense to me than Q = slave_1 (e.g. setting Q equal to slave_1)

    am I late to the party?
    Yes.

    Am I putting too much thought into this?
    Probably.

    Do I care?
    Nope, not at all.

    I like this part of the internet

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3